I’m on my way back to The Hague, returning from the EAIR conference in Copenhagen. Although lots of interesting new studies and findings have been presented there (some of them I’ll discuss in later posts), I actually want to talk about a conference I visited last July in Berlin.

This conference (Transparency in Diversity – Towards a European Classification of Higher Education Institutions) presented the results from the second stage of the project Classifying European Institutions for Higher Education, a project that might turn out to have a major impact on European higher education policy. This project was initiated in 2005 (see this previous post) and is now supported by for instance the European Commission (DG Education) and the German Hochschule Rektorenkonferenz. It’s run by an international team led by Frans van Vught.

The project can be seen as a response to two trends (at least, that’s my interpretation). First of all, there is the emergence of the European higher education area, the objective of the Bologna process. If there’s one space, we need to know what types of institutions are occupying that space and hence, we need a classification or typology.

Secondly, there is the proliferation of ranking and league tables. As I’ve discussed many times before, these rankings present a very uni-dimensional view of the contemporary higher education institution. Basically they only look at the – science heavy – traditional research university. Through this they neglect the quality of a very wide range of other institutions which might be very good at the things they are supposed to do. Here one can think of mono-disciplinary institutions (e.g. colleges of fine arts; schools of economics and business), teaching oriented institutions (like the American liberal arts colleges) ore more professionally and vocationally oriented institutions (like the German and Austrian Fachhochschulen, the Dutch Hogescholen, etc.).

A multidimensional classification of European higher education institutions can on the one hand create more transparency in European higher education, while at the same time clarify which institutions can be compared with each other (so we can compare apples with apples and pears with pears). If you are interested in how they intend to do this, I suggest you have a look at the presentations of the conference. See Frans van Vughts presentation (PDF) to get a better idea about the background of the project and have a look at Frans Kaiser’s presentation (PDF) for the technical aspects of such a multidimensional classification.

What the classification will look like exactly is not yet clear. If it will remain limited to the web tool and the resulting radar graphs, I expect the effects to be rather limited. The question is whether the various stakeholders related to the project will ultimately define real categories of institutions (like the old Carnegie classification did). This however might give the project a more political character. Even though the project-team stresses that they will not create a hierarchical classification, it is interesting to see whether some categories will be perceived as more prestigious than others.

Nevertheless, the classification project seems to be widely supported by institutions throughout Europe and their representative organisations. The feeling that Europe needs to create more transparency is widely shared and at the same time, many institutions are looking for benchmarking opportunities with like-minded institutions. After all, comparisons with Harvard, Oxford and Yale are not very useful for most higher education institutions in Europe…

This article has 12 comments

  1. ???? Co2????

    ???????LSD??????????????????????????????????????????????15??????????? ??22x35mm ? 9x9mm ???????????24mm???????????? ?????????????????????? ????????????????????????? ?????????????? (?755nm?1064nm???) ??????? LUMENIS LightSheer® Desire ???????????????????????????????????????

  2. yeezy 500

    My wife and i ended up being so ecstatic Albert could do his preliminary research with the precious recommendations he discovered using your blog. It’s not at all simplistic to simply possibly be giving away secrets and techniques which the others may have been trying to sell. We really take into account we now have the blog owner to appreciate because of that. Most of the explanations you made, the simple site menu, the friendships your site aid to promote – it is mostly excellent, and it’s aiding our son in addition to the family do think this situation is pleasurable, which is exceptionally indispensable. Thanks for the whole thing!

  3. Kanye West shoes

    I happen to be writing to let you understand what a impressive encounter my child found using the blog. She picked up too many pieces, which included how it is like to have an awesome helping nature to make the rest quite simply comprehend specified multifaceted issues. You really exceeded readers’ desires. Thanks for delivering the great, healthy, edifying and in addition unique thoughts on this topic to Lizeth.

  4. kobe 11

    I want to voice my gratitude for your generosity giving support to individuals who must have help on in this theme. Your very own dedication to passing the solution throughout has been exceedingly informative and have empowered somebody just like me to get to their endeavors. Your new interesting guide means much to me and much more to my peers. Regards; from each one of us.

  5. kd shoes

    Needed to write you this very small observation to help give many thanks again regarding the beautiful advice you’ve documented in this article. It is certainly tremendously open-handed of you to convey freely what many of us could have distributed as an electronic book in making some dough for themselves, particularly since you could have done it if you wanted. These guidelines also worked like the good way to be certain that many people have the identical interest really like mine to figure out many more with regards to this condition. Certainly there are millions of more enjoyable moments ahead for individuals that find out your blog post.

  6. ????-???-??-cosmetic-wiki

    ??????????????????????????CP????? – FG???? – FashionGuide ???????? ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????…?

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.